Contextual contradictions

When two people begin to communicate with different aesthetic background there are high probability that they end being non-constructive. The reason is they only try to understand the message from opposite rather than context behind it. There is nothing demeaning as there was no impure intent and the miscommunication was basically due to lack of co-ordination.

 Context plays a major role while deciding the quality of communication between the individuals. There many chances that when you confidently argue with your dissenter based on certain preconceived context in a fit of a moment. But when you recall the argument at later time of day in a feel good ambience you realize that your entire argument delivery was taken out of your opponent's context. Context can make as well as break the conversation. 

There are instances where two people get into argument with a premeditated context and those kind of argument will most probably end up in brawl. Its something innate that neither of two factions try to arrive at a mid-path as they don't want to give space to opponent's context as that would mean a death knell to their version of illusion. 

 

Everything can be sorted out over a cup of tea when there is an intent to arrive at a solution. But beyond a certain level the point of action is all about show of pounding power rather than allowing the wisdom to take charge. When it comes to pounding power it can only derail the physicality and it is the wisdom that takes the final call.