The immediate outcome of recent Pahalgham attack has been India suspending Indus water treaty with Pakistan. So the point of importance is the water. While getting a first hand information on this development I happened to come across a good information on India's water policy.
In the context of India, the formulation of water policies presents a unique set of challenges. The Constitution allocates jurisdiction over water-related matters to State governments (Schedule VII, List II, Entry 17), while the center holds authority over inter-state rivers and water disputes. Given that river systems often traverse state boundaries, the center assumes a crucial role in ensuring sustainable management and balancing the developmental interests of different states. This may involve utilizing other constitutional entries, such as those about forests, to safeguard catchment areas. Numerous central and state laws address water management, including the state Panchayati Raj Act, which permits the delegation of responsibilities, such as minor irrigation, to Panchayats. Similarly, constitutional provisions allow the transfer of subjects, such as water supply and sanitation to urban local bodies, providing a decentralized approach to water governance (Bhatt & Bhatt 2017; Hutchings et al. 2017).
India's NWP considers water a fundamental human necessity. The management of water resources in India falls under the jurisdiction of individual states, with the central government's role restricted to inter-state water clashes. Thirteen states have formulated SWPs following the guidelines outlined in the NWP during the Eleventh Five-Year Plan, i.e., the period from 2002 to 2012 (Shah 2013). Proactively, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, and Uttar Pradesh developed and implemented their first SWPs in 1994, 1994, and 1999, respectively. The second NWP was issued in 2002, and the centralized India-WRIS (Web-enabled Water Resources Information System) was established in 2008. It compiled valuable data, including a river basin Atlas for India, enabling the free exchange of information among government agencies and citizens. These issues included concerns about river health, conflicts, and paradoxes within the policy's framework.
The NWP of 2012 introduced various recommendations for the conservation, development, and enhanced management of water resources in India. Its core objective was to assess the existing scenario, formulate a comprehensive action plan from a unified national standpoint, and identify the water demand-supply disparity. An extraordinary milestone in this policy was the incorporation of the Public Trust Doctrine, marking its inaugural inclusion in the NWP documentation as a facet of water sector reform and effective governance.
According to the National Water Body Census, 2023, the country will have 2,424,540 water bodies. Among these, 59.5% (1,442,993) comprise ponds, 15.7% (381,805) are categorized as tanks, 12.1% (292,280) are identified as reservoirs, while the remaining 12.7% (307,462) include water conservation structures, check dams, percolation tanks, lakes, and other water bodies. Of the total enumerated water bodies, 97.1% (2,355,055) are in rural areas, and the remaining 2.9% (69,485) are in urban areas. Approximately 78% are artificial water bodies, while 22% are naturally occurring.
Source: https://iwaponline.com/jwcc/article/16/2/493/106726/A-review-of-India-s-water-policy-and
An efficiently designed water dispersion network ensures a compact water supply in a well-organized city. A proper water conveyance framework is necessary to effectively distribute water from the centralized network to individual households (Radhakrishnan & Wu 2018). As an illustration, in India, specifically in Tamil Nadu, AI technology is being employed to manage water resources effectively in regions facing stress. The Tamil Nadu e-Governance Agency has taken proactive steps by introducing an AI-driven, cost-effective monitoring system for rural drinking water supply. This initiative ensures fair and equitable water distribution across rural areas, addressing the challenges of water scarcity and ensuring access to safe drinking water for all. In Tiruchirappalli, a city situated in Tamil Nadu and positioned along the Kaveri River at the head of the Kaveri River delta, the Tiruchi Corporation was chosen by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) to spearhead a pioneering project focused on detecting and minimizing losses in drinking water distribution using AI. Collaborating with the municipal administration department, MoHUA, and a French-based company, the civic body will develop an innovative, intelligent water resource management solution. Mohseni et al. (2021) utilized Bentley WATERGEMS software to analyze the water distribution system in Narangi village of Maharashtra, India. This software enabled them to assess the progression of water within each pipeline, monitor water levels in individual tanks, and assess the expansion of water flow velocity.
In summary, the global revolution in water management through the integration of AI and advanced sensor technologies is evident. India's efficient system, improved by AI models, optimizes water distribution, quality assessment, and infrastructure maintenance. Although challenges persist, such as heavy metal detection and IoT system efficiency, the potential of AI to tackle water scarcity and promote sustainability is promising, offering hope for a more water-secure future.
Forests and water are interlinked
The relationship between forests and water is very critical that needs to be accorded highest priority in the decision making process. The Water Policy of 2012 does not contain any reference to the links between availability of water and the forests, though it states that holistic and interdisciplinary approach to water related issues is missing’, it hardly mentions anything related to the linkages between forest cover and the water runoff or availability of the water in rivers and the watershed forests.
The Central as well as state governments have spent thousands of crores of rupees over the years towards implementation of the watershed programmes. Unfortunately, they are aimed at ‘exploiting’ the water resources through water harvesting structures rather than ‘husbanding’ water and to protect the watersheds of rivers.
In this context it is pertinent to re�ect on the traditional wisdom of people, who designated the watershed forests as ‘sacred groves’ leading to conservation of this fragile region. Compare this to the ongoing policy in which the small streams and tributaries in watersheds are being devastated to construct micro and mini hydel projects as well as run of the river schemes in both Himalayan and Western Ghats.
These practices indicate the sheer disconnect between the forest and water linkages among the policy makers as well as those who have narrow mindset while implementing these projects.