Ugly, uglier, ugliest

Distinction between beautifulness and being ugly is contextual. An individual can praise your beauty but when it is out of context it turns out to be a sarcastic mention. Same holds good for an outward degrading comment. It is all about being in right context.

 

We can see a group of esteemed people praising a person for his bravery and crowning him as their messiah. But in reality they expect him to do the ugly job for them in return for all the praise and honor. And a smart person who enjoys this coronation just posts the ugly job to the underdogs using the same technique used against him by the esteemed i.e. he anoints the underdogs as protectors of the supremacy.

This is a vicious ecosystem of ugliness and is most accepted form of ridiculousness which everyone in the loop are aware of. But vulnerable are the ones who are innocents who donot know they are indeed hired for doing the ugly job of the drag racers. They may or may not realize the trap. Even after they realize, it will always be too late.

 

Though a well informed person may not be visibly affected by this below the table understanding, but these kind of duplicity will be emboldening the individuals who betrays accountability eventually create an ecosystem favoring formation of more duplicates.

Contextual contradictions

When two people begin to communicate with different aesthetic background there are high probability that they end being non-constructive. The reason is they only try to understand the message from opposite rather than context behind it. There is nothing demeaning as there was no impure intent and the miscommunication was basically due to lack of co-ordination.

 Context plays a major role while deciding the quality of communication between the individuals. There many chances that when you confidently argue with your dissenter based on certain preconceived context in a fit of a moment. But when you recall the argument at later time of day in a feel good ambience you realize that your entire argument delivery was taken out of your opponent's context. Context can make as well as break the conversation. 

There are instances where two people get into argument with a premeditated context and those kind of argument will most probably end up in brawl. Its something innate that neither of two factions try to arrive at a mid-path as they don't want to give space to opponent's context as that would mean a death knell to their version of illusion. 

 

Everything can be sorted out over a cup of tea when there is an intent to arrive at a solution. But beyond a certain level the point of action is all about show of pounding power rather than allowing the wisdom to take charge. When it comes to pounding power it can only derail the physicality and it is the wisdom that takes the final call.