**Supreme Order, Higher Order, Transcendence, and Fact-Checking**

**Supreme Order, Higher Order, Transcendence, and Fact-Checking**

Sanatan Dharma is often regarded as the supreme order of the universe—a claim that has few challengers and even fewer who can disprove it convincingly.

While many sought to dispute or challenge this supreme order, some thinkers took a different approach. Instead of confronting it head-on, they asked a more subtle question: why not *fact-check* it?

This inquiry led to the creation of a higher order—a framework capable of assessing the claims of the supreme order. In practical terms, this became the Constitution: a structured system that could examine the principles of the supreme order without denying its existence.

As courts began to function under constitutional provisions, various cases emerged that tested practices rooted in Sanatan Dharma. Although courts could not ultimately challenge the eternal truths of the supreme order, they operated within the constitutional framework to deliver justice, acting as a reasoned voice in societal affairs.

The ultimate test of the higher order, however, is to *transcend* the supreme order—not to destroy it, but to validate the fact-checking process and make the supreme order more applicable and humane in the modern world.

While the higher order transcending the supreme order, fact-checking becomes a tool for alignment rather than confrontation. It brings ancient wisdom closer to contemporary realities, ensuring that the supreme order remains relevant, compassionate, and resonant with the needs of today.

This interplay benefits the welfare of humanity in the long run as it balance the ancientness and modern philosophy wherein rigid customs of ancient roots get ample grounds to adapt to modern version of the world through constitutional interpretation.